五笔输入法 2 1.6.5

Wubi Input Method - An Efficient Input Solution

Since its inception in 1983, the Wubi Input Method has seen the development of three distinct versions: the first generation 86 version, the second generation 98 version, and the third generation New Century version (New Century Wubi Input Method). Collectively referred to as Wangma Wubi, the 86 version remains the most influential and widely adopted encoding scheme. Its redesigned radical system aligns more closely with partitioning and positioning principles, making it both more scientific and easier to remember, thereby enhancing usability and standardizing character decomposition.

Advantages of Wubi:

1. Typing Similar to Handwriting: The process of typing a character mimics handwriting closely. Typists can achieve speeds of 60 to 120 characters per minute with minimal effort, which is significantly faster compared to handwriting. Users can focus on content creation without the distraction of selecting characters.
2. Building Blocks of Chinese Characters: The radicals can be likened to "Chinese character building blocks," making typing with Wubi akin to a child’s game. This approach not only benefits cognitive development but also holds substantial educational value in teaching Chinese characters. For example, the character 美 consists of 丷 + 王 + 大, rather than incorrect representations. Furthermore, practicing typing to correct errors may prove more effective than repetitive handwriting exercises.
3. Comparison with Pinyin Input Methods: Wubi allows for single character input at speeds unattainable by handwriting. Pinyin methods require typing phrases to achieve similar speeds, necessitating constant monitoring between thought and screen, which hinders creative flow. The relationship between Pinyin and Wubi resembles that of running versus cycling.
4. Comparison with Voice Input Methods: Wubi's versatility surpasses that of voice input, which is often influenced by context, time, dialects, and homophones. Environments such as classrooms may pose challenges for voice recognition due to potential interruptions.
5. Comparison with Audio or Video Recording: Text produced via Wubi can be directly read, edited, or printed—computers can even read it aloud. In contrast, reviewing ten hours of recordings necessitates an equal amount of listening time, while transcribing requires even more effort.
6. Comparison with Handwriting Input Methods: Typing with Wubi is faster and more accurate than handwriting, reducing eye strain. Handwriting input methods revert to pre-computer eras by only addressing the capability issue without efficiency considerations. Even advanced technology can match handwritten speed but cannot compare with Wubi's efficiency.
7. Comparison with Full-Page Scanning Recognition: Scanning is merely a technical method for processing existing documents. It does not contribute to original text production but rather handles previously created content through recognition processes.

Learning Methods:

The learning process for mastering Wubi involves familiarizing oneself with radicals, comprehensively understanding encoding rules, mastering decomposition principles, and practicing for reinforcement.

The initial step involves knowing all radicals by heart while understanding their distribution patterns and keyboard layout. Utilizing resources such as dictionaries or applications that provide Wubi encoding will significantly aid beginners in this process.

Two Learning Approaches:

• Mnemotechnics Approach: Quickly grasp radicals through mnemonic devices before mastering decomposition rules.
• No Memorization Approach: Remember radicals by observing their arrangement during decomposition practice.